• gb_flag germany_flag japan_flag korea_flag china_flag
  • Home
  • About
    • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Initiatives & Events
      • Inspirational Innovators
    • Awards
    • History
  • Team
  • Services
    • Create & Protect
    • Patents
    • Trade Marks & Brands
    • Designs
    • Copyright
    • Domain Names
    • IP Strategy
    • IP Due Diligence
    • IP Audits & Health Checks
    • Brand Strategy
    • IP Exploitation & Commercial Issues
    • IP Searching & Clearance
    • Disputes & Litigation
    • Litigation
    • Oppositions & Cancellation Actions
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Online Enforcement & Anti-counterfeiting
    • Domain Name Disputes
    • UP & UPC
    • Unitary patents
    • Unified Patent Court
    • Representation
    • Revocation
    • Infringement
  • Sectors
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Biotechnology, Chemistry & Pharmaceuticals
    • Business & Finance
    • Creative, Entertainment, Hospitality & Media
    • Consumer, Luxury & Fashion Goods
    • Electronics, Engineering & IT
    • Energy
    • Medical Technologies
  • Clients
    • Spin-outs, Start-Ups & SMEs
    • Academics & Tech Transfer
    • Inventors
    • Overseas Law Agencies
    • In-house Counsel & Corporates
    • Venture Capitalists & Investors
  • News & Events
  • Knowledge Bank
    • IP Cases & Articles
    • Webinars & Videos
    • FAQs and Guides
    • Newsletters
    • UP & UPC
  • Careers
    • Current Vacancies
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Open days
    • Knowledge & Learning
    • What Our Team Says
  • Contact Us
gb_flag germany_flag japan_flag korea_flag china_flag

Search results for "" 2299 results found

Sort By By Date By Relevance
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Vans v Paredes: when is a V not a V?

    Posted on 21 September 2021
    Paredes Holding Center (Paredes) filed an EUTM application for the position mark shown below in respect of safety and protective footwear in class 9 and footwear goods in class 25:
    Gemma Kirkland
    Gemma Kirkland
    Partner, Trade Mark Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Sky v SkyKick: Court of Appeal issues judgment

    Posted on 21 September 2021
    The Court of Appeal has issued its judgment in the SKYKICK saga. To re-cap, the case concerned the validity of trade marks (i) covering overly broad and/or unclear/imprecise specifications and (ii) where an applicant does not have an intention to use the mark for all goods/services covered.
    Matthew Dick
    Matthew Dick
    Partner, Solicitor
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Guerlain’s lipstick shape indicates product origin in the EU

    Posted on 21 September 2021
    The French cosmetics company Guerlain was recently successful in getting trade mark protection in the European Union for a particular lipstick shape (judgment of 14 July 2021, Case T-488/20).
    Jana Bogatz
    Jana Bogatz
    Partner, Rechtsanwältin
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Germany has ratified the Protocol on the Provisional Application of UPC Agreement

    Posted on 28 September 2021
    Germany has ratified the Protocol on the Provisional Application of UPC Agreement (PAP-Protocol) and paves the way for the Unified Patent Court (UPC).
    Hanns-Juergen Grosse
    Hanns-Juergen Grosse
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Slovenia has ratified the Protocol to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPC) on provisional application (PPA) and the UPC Agreement (UPCA)

    Posted on 18 October 2021
    On 15 October 2021, the Slovenian Government deposited the instrument of ratification for the PPA and the UPCA.
    Hanns-Juergen Grosse
    Hanns-Juergen Grosse
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    T 1197/18: clarification of the video conferencing order issued on G 1/21

    Posted on 20 October 2021
    T1197/18 provides some clarity on the scope of the term “impairing� in the order concerning video conferencing (ViCo) issued on G1/21 by the Enlarged Board of Appeal.
    Stephanie Wroe
    Stephanie Wroe
    Associate, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Too much time for “live� - Facebook v Voxer IP: struggles with equivalence in a post-Actavis world

    Posted on 20 October 2021
    In this recent case, Facebook’s live broadcast feature was found not to infringe Voxer’s patent related to exchanging messages in “live� and “time-shifted� communication modes. Specifically, it was deemed that a minimum 10-second delay between content being captured by one user and being viewed by another user was “just too…
    Arun Roy
    Arun Roy
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Database management and information retrieval systems - has their time finally come?

    Posted on 20 October 2021
    The realm of computer-implemented inventions is a challenging one, with traps and pitfalls for the unaware and unwary. The guidance provided by the European Patent Office (EPO) to its examiners for assessing the patentability of computer-implemented inventions provides valuable insight into how to navigate this troublesome area.
    Anton Baker
    Anton Baker
    Partner, Patent Attorney
    William Smith
    William Smith
    Associate, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Germany simplifies and modernises industrial property laws

    Posted on 20 October 2021
    Germany offers an outstanding system for IP protection – its patent and trade mark office (the DPMA) is the largest national IP office in Europe and the fifth largest national patent office in the world. It is however over ten years since the last major reform of industrial property protection…
    Hanns-Juergen Grosse
    Hanns-Juergen Grosse
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    FibroGen Ltd v Akebia Therapeutics - when are structurally- and functionally-defined claims excessively broad?

    Posted on 20 October 2021
    The Court of Appeal recently clarified the steps for assessing whether claims defined both structurally and functionally are insufficient due to excessive claim breadth, under the UK Patents Act 1977. The case involved two FibroGen patent families relating to a class of compounds for use in treating two forms of…
    Laura Jennings
    Laura Jennings
    Senior Associate, Patent Attorney

Page 159 of 230

Previous Next
  • Show all
  • Cases & Articles (1589)
  • Webinars & Videos (55)
  • News (183)
  • Events (10)
  • FAQs & Guides (16)
  • Newsletters (264)
  • About (5)
  • Sectors (8)
  • Services (20)
  • Clients (6)
  • Offices (3)
  • Team (136)
  • Vacancy (4)
  • General
About Team Services Sectors Clients Knowledge Bank
Careers Privacy Policy Cookies Policy Modern Slavery Statement Urgent Instructions LLP List of Members
Contact us mail@dyoung.com +44 (0)20 7269 8550
London Munich Southampton
© Copyright 2010-2026 D Young & Co. All rights reserved.

Sharing IP information such as new legislation, relevant case law, market trends and other topical issues is important to us. We send out our IP newsletters by email about once a month, publish IP books annually, share occasional IP news alerts and also invitations to our IP events such as webinars and seminars. We take your privacy seriously and you can change your mailing preferences or unsubscribe at any time.

To sign up to our marketing communications, please fill out this form.

Your contact details

Name

What would you like to hear from us about?

Patent news
Patent webinars
Biotech patent webinars
UP & UPC News
UP & UPC Webinars
SPC webinars
Trade mark news
Trade mark webinars
IPEC news & webinars
Design news
Design webinars

You can contact us at subscriptions@dyoung.com, telephone +44 (0) 20 7269 8850 or write to us at D Young & Co LLP, 3 Noble Street, London, EC2V 7BQ to update your preferences at any time.

We use cookies in our email marketing communications. You can view our privacy policy here and cookie policy here.

Almost finished! Submit this form and we will send you an email for you to confirm your preferences.

We use cookies in our email marketing communications. You can view our privacy policy here and cookie policy here.