• gb_flag germany_flag japan_flag korea_flag china_flag
  • Home
  • About
    • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Initiatives & Events
      • Inspirational Innovators
    • Awards
    • History
  • Team
  • Services
    • Create & Protect
    • Patents
    • Trade Marks & Brands
    • Designs
    • Copyright
    • Domain Names
    • IP Strategy
    • IP Due Diligence
    • IP Audits & Health Checks
    • Brand Strategy
    • IP Exploitation & Commercial Issues
    • IP Searching & Clearance
    • Disputes & Litigation
    • Litigation
    • Oppositions & Cancellation Actions
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Online Enforcement & Anti-counterfeiting
    • Domain Name Disputes
    • UP & UPC
    • Unitary patents
    • Unified Patent Court
    • Representation
    • Revocation
    • Infringement
  • Sectors
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Biotechnology, Chemistry & Pharmaceuticals
    • Business & Finance
    • Creative, Entertainment, Hospitality & Media
    • Consumer, Luxury & Fashion Goods
    • Electronics, Engineering & IT
    • Energy
    • Medical Technologies
  • Clients
    • Spin-outs, Start-Ups & SMEs
    • Academics & Tech Transfer
    • Inventors
    • Overseas Law Agencies
    • In-house Counsel & Corporates
    • Venture Capitalists & Investors
  • News & Events
  • Knowledge Bank
    • IP Cases & Articles
    • Webinars & Videos
    • FAQs and Guides
    • Newsletters
    • UP & UPC
  • Careers
    • Current Vacancies
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Open days
    • Knowledge & Learning
    • What Our Team Says
  • Contact Us
gb_flag germany_flag japan_flag korea_flag china_flag

Search results for "" 2279 results found

Sort By By Date By Relevance
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Interpreting patent claims: G 1/24 seeks Enlarged Board of Appeal clarification

    Posted on 05 August 2024
    G 1/24 seeks clarification of the legal basis for interpreting patent claims for the purpose of assessing patentability, particularly whether and to what extent the description and figures may be used. Recent Unified Patent Court (UPC) decisions have suggested that the description and drawings must always be used, highlighting a…
    Emma Hamilton
    Emma Hamilton
    Senior Associate, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Lack of inventive step from a realistic starting point: Sanofi v Amgen

    Posted on 05 August 2024
    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) has issued three substantive decisions in recent weeks which have kept European patent litigators with a keen interest in the new system on their toes. First we had the Düsseldorf Local Division decision in Franz Kaldewei v Bette on 03 July 2024, closely followed by…
    Rachel Bateman
    Rachel Bateman
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    UPC departs from EPO selection principle in novelty analysis: Dexcom v Abbott

    Posted on 08 August 2024
    According to established European Patent Office (EPO) practice, a selection of one or more elements from a single list of specifically disclosed elements does not confer novelty. However, in Dexcom v Abbott the UPC Paris Local Division concluded that a single selection was sufficient to render a claim novel.
    Nathaniel Wand
    Nathaniel Wand
    Senior Associate, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    UPC Court of Appeal corrects course for provisional measures in Abbott v SiBio

    Posted on 23 August 2024
    A recent wave of lawsuits relating to medtech devices has led to some interesting insights concerning the Unified Patent Court’s (UPC) approach to requests for preliminary injunctions. In this article we consider the questions of the UPC’s jurisdiction.
    Stephen Solomon
    Stephen Solomon
    Technical Assistant
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Colour in the context of design registration protection in the UK, and when it can be worth considering

    Posted on 21 August 2024
    In the context of protecting the appearance of a consumer product in the UK using design registration protection, a focus on protecting the shape of the product is usually a promising starting point. Though, particularly when it comes to lookalikes, anyone seeking to mimic the appearance of a consumer product…
    William Burrell
    William Burrell
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    The DF21 design searching service provided by the UK design registry: an underused, and overlooked, resource?

    Posted on 27 August 2024
    When it comes to commercialising a product in the UK, failure to perform any due diligence on whether its underlying design infringes an existing design registration covering the UK can be costly.
    William Burrell
    William Burrell
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Romania becomes 18th member state of UPC

    Posted on 02 September 2024
    Any unitary patent (UP) registered from 01 September 2024 will now designate Romania.
    Sophie Slater
    Sophie Slater
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    CHIQUITA, tell me whats wrong: EUIPO errs in distinctiveness and similarity findings

    Posted on 05 September 2024
    The General Court has annulled the EU Intellectual Property Office’s (EUIPO) decisions concerning oppositions to the mark CHIQUITA QUEEN.
    Peter Byrd
    Peter Byrd
    Senior Associate, Solicitor
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Minuty SaS v Miura Brands: earlier mark wins the gold

    Posted on 05 September 2024
    A mutually shared distinctive element between two marks is enough to cause confusion. The EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) found a likelihood of confusion between ROSE ET OR and OR ONLYROSE.
    Kamila Geremek
    Kamila Geremek
    Associate, Solicitor
  • IP Cases & Articles

    EU Board of Appeal overturns refusal: distinctiveness of a position mark

    Posted on 05 September 2024
    The application (EU designation of IR No. 1729330) was a position mark filed by SRAM LLC seeking protection in respect of the following class 12 goods: “bicycles parts, namely cassettes, sprockets and sprocket wheels”. SRAM described the position mark as follows: “the trade mark claims protection for a ring like…
    Rachel Pellatt
    Rachel Pellatt
    Senior Associate, Trade Mark Attorney

Page 194 of 228

Previous Next
  • Show all
  • Cases & Articles (1571)
  • Webinars & Videos (55)
  • News (178)
  • Events (17)
  • FAQs & Guides (16)
  • Newsletters (262)
  • About (5)
  • Sectors (8)
  • Services (20)
  • Clients (6)
  • Offices (3)
  • Team (133)
  • Vacancy (5)
  • General
About Team Services Sectors Clients Knowledge Bank
Careers Privacy Policy Cookies Policy Modern Slavery Statement Urgent Instructions LLP List of Members
Contact us mail@dyoung.com +44 (0)20 7269 8550
London Munich Southampton
© Copyright 2010-2026 D Young & Co. All rights reserved.

Sharing IP information such as new legislation, relevant case law, market trends and other topical issues is important to us. We send out our IP newsletters by email about once a month, publish IP books annually, share occasional IP news alerts and also invitations to our IP events such as webinars and seminars. We take your privacy seriously and you can change your mailing preferences or unsubscribe at any time.

To sign up to our marketing communications, please fill out this form.

Your contact details

Name

What would you like to hear from us about?

Patent news
Patent webinars
Biotech patent webinars
UP & UPC News
UP & UPC Webinars
SPC webinars
Trade mark news
Trade mark webinars
IPEC news & webinars
Design news
Design webinars

You can contact us at subscriptions@dyoung.com, telephone +44 (0) 20 7269 8850 or write to us at D Young & Co LLP, 3 Noble Street, London, EC2V 7BQ to update your preferences at any time.

We use cookies in our email marketing communications. You can view our privacy policy here and cookie policy here.

Almost finished! Submit this form and we will send you an email for you to confirm your preferences.

We use cookies in our email marketing communications. You can view our privacy policy here and cookie policy here.