Search results for "" 2268 results found
Sort By
By Date
By Relevance
-
IP Cases & Articles
UK High Court rejects AI inventors
Readers may be aware of the increased interest in the question of whether an artificial intelligence can be named as an inventor of a patent application. The UK High Court has now issued a decision on the appeal raised by Dr Thaler regarding whether his AI named “DABUS” can be… -
News
Top tier for patents and trade marks in Chambers UK 2021
We are pleased to report that Chambers has ranked D Young & Co as a top tier UK patent and trade mark firm in its 2021 edition. -
News
IP STARS rising stars: best-performing UK attorneys 2020-21
We are delighted to report that trade mark group Senior Associate Flora Cook and patent group Senior Associates Matthew Caines and Holly Cowie are featured as IPSTARS Rising Stars in the UK 2020-21. -
Webinars & Videos
Goodbye Neurim Hello Santen
Garreth Duncan reviews the recent CJEU Santen decision which changes the picture on what marketing approvals can support an SPC in the EU. -
News
World Trademark Review Global Leaders 2020
D Young & Co trade mark partner Jeremy Pennant is highlighted as one of only 36 UK trade mark practitioners featured in WTR's Global Leaders 2020. Now in its second year of publication, WTR Global Leaders "brings together the world's foremost law and corporate experts in trademark practice". -
IP Cases & Articles
Remote hearings in the UK courts is this the virtual road ahead?
Over a few short weeks during March and April 2020, the English court system was forced to reform and modernise the way that court services are delivered, in particular by embracing the use of video technology. Up to that point, fully remote video hearings in the civil courts had only… -
News
D Young & Co prolific & effective: Legal 500 UK 2021
We are delighted to celebrate news that our patent and trade mark attorney teams have been ranked as top tier in the Legal 500 rankings for the 20th consecutive year. -
IP Cases & Articles
(In)Divisibility of the grounds of invalidity & the need for reasoned statement
Does Art. 25(1)(b) of the Community Design Regulation (CDR) require the EUIPO to assess whether all requirements under Art. 4-9 CDR are met? If the answer is no, when is there a need for a reasoned statement? -
IP Cases & Articles
Logitechs 3D shape mark: EUIPO drops the mic
In case R 2630/2019-4, the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) dismissed Logitech’s appeal against the refusal to register its 3D mark for the shape of a microphone. The Board of Appeal agreed with the examiner’s assessment that the mark lacked distinctive character under… -
IP Cases & Articles
First Grade International v KO-CO Foods: indirect confusion
In this case, the UKIPO held that there was no likelihood of direct confusion between the figurative KO-CO application and the earlier koko and KOKO DESIRE marks, but that there was a likelihood of indirect confusion.
Page 102 of 227
Previous Next