Search results for "" 2269 results found
Sort By
By Date
By Relevance
-
IP Cases & Articles
Launch of the UKIPO One IPO transformation programme
On Friday 22 April the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) launched its One IPO transformation programme. The One IPO programme is a five-year project to modernise and integrate intellectual property rights in the UK. -
IP Cases & Articles
J0009/18: four substantial procedural violations and a legal inaccuracy
Appeals against the Receiving Section at the EPO tend to be few and far between. Nevertheless such appeals tend to relate to procedural matters and can deal with complex matters of law. In this case, the Board of Appeal identified a total of four substantial procedural violations that had occurred… -
IP Cases & Articles
Brexit and the UK design registration database cloning process almost (but not yet fully) complete
Following the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020 concerning the departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union, the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) has been working to update the UK design register to include all of the newly ‘cloned’ UK design registrations stemming from affected… -
IP Cases & Articles
Original Beauty Technology v G4K Fashion: Passing off is not a tort of unfair competition
Original Beauty Technology (the claimants)s and G4K Fashion (the defendants) operate online businesses and design and sell “bodycon” and “bandage” style dresses under the brands HOUSE OF CB and OH POLLY (respectively). The Original Beauty Technology also owns and operates sister brand MISTRESS ROCKS, which is aimed at a slight… -
IP Cases & Articles
Happily eva after! Time to get re-aqua-ainted with global assessment
In February 2019, EvaQua s.r.o. (EvaQua) applied to register the EUTM (below left) in class 32. Envasados Eva S.A. (Eva) opposed the application under Articles 8(1)(a) and (b) based on a number of earlier rights, all covering identical goods. The opposition was assessed on the basis of the mark shown… -
IP Cases & Articles
Kerrygold v Kerrymaid - is the element kerry distinctive in the EU?
In this decision the General Court had to decide whether the potentially descriptive meaning of the element “KERRY” (referring to a geographical location in Ireland) and peaceful co-existence in part of the EU would be sufficient to exclude a likelihood of confusion. The General Court said no – at least… -
IP Cases & Articles
Non-use revocation proceedings: German Federal Supreme Court questions relevance of no-challenge agreements
In T-419/16 (Carrera Brands Ltd v the EUIPO, 16 November 2017) the General Court quashed the relevance of contractual non-challenge agreements in EU revocation proceedings on grounds of non-use. In a remarkable side blow, the general Court even stated that national courts have no authority to sentence a party under… -
IP Cases & Articles
T-515/19: Legos brick design remains valid
The General Court recently had to consider (in case T-515/19) whether Lego could use the defence of Article 8(3) of the Community Design Regulation (CDR), which exempts modular products from the general “must fit” exclusion from design protection under Article 8(2), and the relationship between the various exceptions of Article… -
IP Cases & Articles
T 1952/18 prior use and inventive step
T1952/18 relates to an appeal against the decision to maintain European patent EP2512840 in its granted form. The appellant (opponent) requested that the patent be revoked while the respondent (patentee) requested that the patent be allowed in an amended form. -
IP Cases & Articles
Is this the end of ViCo before the EPO without consent of all parties?
In the pending referral before the Enlarged Board of Appeal, G 1/21, there is posed an important question for all parties involved in oral proceedings before the EPO. Namely: Is the conduct of oral proceedings in the form of a videoconference compatible with the right to oral proceedings as enshrined…
Page 155 of 227
Previous Next