• gb_flag germany_flag japan_flag korea_flag china_flag
  • Home
  • About
    • Diversity & Inclusion
      • Initiatives & Events
      • Inspirational Innovators
    • Awards
    • History
  • Team
  • Services
    • Create & Protect
    • Patents
    • Trade Marks & Brands
    • Designs
    • Copyright
    • Domain Names
    • IP Strategy
    • IP Due Diligence
    • IP Audits & Health Checks
    • Brand Strategy
    • IP Exploitation & Commercial Issues
    • IP Searching & Clearance
    • Disputes & Litigation
    • Litigation
    • Oppositions & Cancellation Actions
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Online Enforcement & Anti-counterfeiting
    • Domain Name Disputes
    • UP & UPC
    • Unitary patents
    • Unified Patent Court
    • Representation
    • Revocation
    • Infringement
  • Sectors
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Biotechnology, Chemistry & Pharmaceuticals
    • Business & Finance
    • Creative, Entertainment, Hospitality & Media
    • Consumer, Luxury & Fashion Goods
    • Electronics, Engineering & IT
    • Energy
    • Medical Technologies
  • Clients
    • Spin-outs, Start-Ups & SMEs
    • Academics & Tech Transfer
    • Inventors
    • Overseas Law Agencies
    • In-house Counsel & Corporates
    • Venture Capitalists & Investors
  • News & Events
  • Knowledge Bank
    • IP Cases & Articles
    • Webinars & Videos
    • FAQs and Guides
    • Newsletters
    • UP & UPC
  • Careers
    • Current Vacancies
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Open days
    • Knowledge & Learning
    • What Our Team Says
  • Contact Us
gb_flag germany_flag japan_flag korea_flag china_flag

Search results for "" 1588 results found

Sort By By Date By Relevance
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Scope of discretion for late trade mark evidence

    Posted on 29 April 2015
    Following a revision of OHIM's guidelines in June 2014, late additional evidence may be accepted in Community trade mark (CTM) opposition proceedings where it merely strengthens and clarifies relevant evidence presented before the deadline. Decisions from the General Court (T-393/12 and T-322/13 Kenzo Tsujimoto v OHIM) and Board of Appeal…
    Jennifer Heath
    Jennifer Heath
    Senior Associate, Trade Mark Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Nissan: renewal requests to be full and timely filed

    Posted on 29 April 2015
    The General Court (GC) ruling in Nissan v OHIM highlights the need to ensure that renewal requests are made in full before the renewal date expires - otherwise rights may not be recoverable.
    Gemma Kirkland
    Gemma Kirkland
    Partner, Trade Mark Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Innocent smoothies The Dude logo: ownership agreements

    Posted on 05 April 2015
    This is a case that centres on whether a contract which included assignment of copyright provisions was executed; and whether the provisions in that agreement correctly assigned the copyright.
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Groundless threat provisions - what are they for?

    Posted on 02 April 2015
    Groundless threat provisions under UK law are unique in the sense that they aim to safeguard the interests of both IP right holders and third parties at the same time. On one hand IP right holders may be wondering "what steps can I take to protect my IP rights? If…
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Patent litigation funding and insurance

    Posted on 01 April 2015
    For parties involved in patent litigation, the potential costs and financial risks involved can often be a significant factor in dictating strategy. In some cases, concerns about costs risks or a lack of funding may even be a complete barrier to commencing litigation against known infringers.
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Courts take a fresh look at toxic priorities

    Posted on 01 April 2015
    The concept of multiple priorities, sometimes referred to as partial priority or split priority, has long been a matter for debate in European patent law (and thus UK patent law [see end note 1]). However, interest in how the law governing multiple priorities is to be interpreted has been stimulated…
  • IP Cases & Articles

    EPO publishes new G3/14 decision

    Posted on 26 March 2015
    The EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal have made available a copy of their decision on this case, which considers the issue of whether the Opposition Division are allowed (or even obliged) to consider the clarity of an amendment in which a dependent claim is 'inserted' into an independent claim.
    Alan Boyd
    Alan Boyd
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Unitary patent: renewal fees disclosed

    Posted on 09 March 2015
    The potential cost of the European patent with unitary effect (the unitary patent), compared to the cost of a standard bundle of European patents, has been the subject of much debate - since over the lifetime of a patent, the renewal fees can account for a considerable proportion of the…
    Doug Ealey
    Doug Ealey
    Partner, Patent Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Whitby v Yorkshire ice cream van IP infringement

    Posted on 06 March 2015
    The High Court of England and Wales has found there to be infringement of certain ice cream van designs and a related trade mark in an interesting case which serves to illustrate the High Court's approach in assessing individual character, particularly with regard to the validity of registered designs of…
    Richard Burton
    Richard Burton
    Partner, Trade Mark Attorney
  • IP Cases & Articles

    Enterprise and Europcar fight over use of 'e'

    Posted on 06 March 2015
    A recent decision from the High Court has provided detailed insight to the relevant public assessment for cases where foreign consumers outside the UK should be given 'cautious' consideration.

Page 124 of 159

Previous Next
  • Show all
  • Cases & Articles (1588)
  • Webinars & Videos (55)
  • News (183)
  • Events (10)
  • FAQs & Guides (16)
  • Newsletters (264)
  • About (5)
  • Sectors (8)
  • Services (20)
  • Clients (6)
  • Offices (3)
  • Team (136)
  • Vacancy (5)
  • General
About Team Services Sectors Clients Knowledge Bank
Careers Privacy Policy Cookies Policy Modern Slavery Statement Urgent Instructions LLP List of Members
Contact us mail@dyoung.com +44 (0)20 7269 8550
London Munich Southampton
© Copyright 2010-2026 D Young & Co. All rights reserved.

Sharing IP information such as new legislation, relevant case law, market trends and other topical issues is important to us. We send out our IP newsletters by email about once a month, publish IP books annually, share occasional IP news alerts and also invitations to our IP events such as webinars and seminars. We take your privacy seriously and you can change your mailing preferences or unsubscribe at any time.

To sign up to our marketing communications, please fill out this form.

Your contact details

Name

What would you like to hear from us about?

Patent news
Patent webinars
Biotech patent webinars
UP & UPC News
UP & UPC Webinars
SPC webinars
Trade mark news
Trade mark webinars
IPEC news & webinars
Design news
Design webinars

You can contact us at subscriptions@dyoung.com, telephone +44 (0) 20 7269 8850 or write to us at D Young & Co LLP, 3 Noble Street, London, EC2V 7BQ to update your preferences at any time.

We use cookies in our email marketing communications. You can view our privacy policy here and cookie policy here.

Almost finished! Submit this form and we will send you an email for you to confirm your preferences.

We use cookies in our email marketing communications. You can view our privacy policy here and cookie policy here.