IPEC insights: fruitful litigation, pear-shaped counterclaims

MOUNTAIN PEAR and YU LU FRAGRANT PEAR registrations survive genericism, descriptiveness and non-distinctiveness attacks.
Agnieszka Stephenson
Agnieszka Stephenson
Associate, Solicitor
IPEC insights: fruitful litigation, pear-shaped counterclaims

IPEC insights: Dryrobe v D-Robe - why policing your trade mark matters

The decision of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) in Dryrobe v D-Robe considers issues of genericism in trade mark…
Kamila Geremek
Kamila Geremek
Solicitor
IPEC insights: Dryrobe v D-Robe - why policing your trade mark matters

IPEC insights: Luxe World v Touch of Vogue - account of profits not available in threats action

The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) has issued a helpful decision in an interim strikeout application confirming that an account…
Phil Leonard
Phil Leonard
Associate, Solicitor
Oscar Webb
Oscar Webb
Partner, Solicitor
IPEC insights: Luxe World v Touch of Vogue - account of profits not available in threats action

IPEC insights: Edozo v Valos - no copyright protection in functionality (the limits of software copyright)

This recent Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) decision concerned an application by Edozo Limited (the claimant) against Valos (UK) Limited…
Ella Lane
Ella Lane
Associate, Solicitor
Oscar Webb
Oscar Webb
Partner, Solicitor
IPEC insights: Edozo v Valos - no copyright protection in functionality (the limits of software copyright)